| The
47
Laboratory
Phono
Playback
System |
|
|
|
Paul
Szabady |
|
16
March 2001 |
Specifications
| 4712
PHONOCUBE MC
Cartridge
Equalizer |
$2,100 |
| 4700
Power Humpty
power supply |
$1,800 |
| System
Price |
$3,900 |
|
|
| Miyabi
47 moving
coil phono
cartridge |
$3,990 |
| 4706
GAINCARD
power
amplifier |
$1,500 |
| 4700
Power Humpty
power supply |
$1,800 |
| System
Price |
$3,300 |
|
|
| Total
System Price |
$11,190 |
Distributed
by
Sakura Systems
2 Rocky Mt. Rd.
Jefferson MA 01522
Tel: (508)
829-3426
e-mail: sakurastms@aol.com
Website: www.sakurasystems.com
Only
The Most Simple
Can Accommodate
the Most Complex
I
must admit to a
deep sympathy with
maverick designs
that challenge
orthodox ways of
doing things.
Couple that
unconventional
design with an
aesthetic
genuinely rooted
in Zen philosophy
and my attention
is guaranteed. 47
Laboratory is just
such a company;
their design credo
aligns them with a
long Japanese
tradition that
also inspired the
Bauhaus, Frank
Lloyd Wright, many
20th
century artists,
even penetrating
popular US culture
– "Less is
More" and
"K.I.S.S."
(Keep It Simple,
Stupid!) –
derive from that
same inspiration.
Anyone
familiar with
Haiku poetry, Sumi-e
landscape
painting, the Zen
Garden, or Bonsai
will immediately
recognize the
underlying
principle, a
simplicity and
solidity of form
that seems almost
artless, evoking
the impression
that the object
occurred
spontaneously and
naturally,
manifesting both
capital and small
"r"
reality. (For Zen,
the Ultimate
Reality and common
reality are one
and the same.)
Applied
to 47 Laboratory’s
products, this
philosophy of
simplicity
manifests itself
in very compact,
almost miniature
design, the
shortest possible
circuit paths, the
minimum number of
the highest
quality parts, and
an over-arching
singularity and
integration of
design criteria.
Dual-mono
construction and a
resonance-controlled
chassis are
further aspects of
the integrated
approach to ensure
maximum
information
transfer. In this
sense it shares
some common
principles with
the SET tube
school, the major
difference being
that 47 Lab’s
products are
solid-state.
The
bigger-is-better
school of US
audiophilia will
be shocked at the
size of these
components. The
Gaincard power
amplifier is
roughly the size
and shape of a box
of wooden kitchen
matches, the
Phonocube similar,
except that it’s
a cube. Those who
equate size with
performance will
likely overlook
these diminutive
products. That
error will be to
their musical
loss.
Maverick
the designs are,
and as such,
require
readjusting habits
acquired from
conventional
components. The
Phonocube offers
no input
impedance, but
amplifies the
current of the MC
rather than its
voltage. Thus one
needs to rethink
one’s cartridge
loading
assumptions and
apply a different
formula in
ascertaining
correct loading.
The Phonocube runs
directly into the
Gaincard power
amp, which also
offers volume
control. (It can
also be used with
a conventional
line stage
preamplifier.) The
power supplies are
long cylinders (8
inches long with a
5-inch diameter)
that rest on two
small stainless
steel devices that
roughly resemble
miniature
hourglasses. The
designs utilize
op-amps. The
speaker connectors
will not allow the
use of ocean-liner
docking lines. The
Gaincard amp
produces 25 watts
per channel. The
Miyabi 47
cartridge has a
flip-down stylus
guard, a short
cantilever and
uses alnico
magnets.
Why
Do We Even Call
Them Audio
"Systems"?
It’s
been a long
accepted dogma
that separate
components are the
path to successful
high fidelity. One
can mix and match
components from
different
manufacturers to
theoretically
produce the ideal
sound for one’s
needs and budget.
But it is equally
true that many
real-world systems
are anything but,
often being a
hodge-podge of
components
fighting each
other, nullifying
and compromising
each other’s
strengths, or just
generally shooting
each other in the
foot. Thus there
is much to commend
a true system
approach in which
all the components
are made by one
manufacturer and
thus share one
overarching design
concept and a
consistent sound.
Listening to a
complete Linn or
Rega system, for
example, allows
one to experience
the design’s
intention. To
fully understand
the 47 Laboratory
approach, I did
most of my
auditioning to
their products as
a complete phono
playback system.
The
Miyabi 47 moving
coil cartridge was
designed and
manufactured by
Miyabi to
implement 47 Labs’
philosophy. Its
internal impedance
is 2 ohms,
allowing
sufficient output
from the
current-amplifying
Phonocube to drive
the Gaincard
directly. No
active line stage
preamplification
is necessary.
Utilizing alnico
magnets (which
some
retro-enthusiasts
imbue with an
almost mystical
quality); a short
and stiff aluminum
cantilever with a
line-contact
stylus; and a
generating system
that is physically
protected by a
woven, fabric-like
material, the
cartridge evokes
memories of the
vintage Supex in
appearance. Like
many older MC
cartridges, it
also dumps a lot
of vibrational
energy into the
arm and record –
needle-talk is
louder than some
conventional
designs.
Designed
for maximum
information
transfer, the
design requires
careful set-up in
arm height to
avoid the
generator-protecting
fabric from
fouling the
record. As such it
deviates from
standard
procedures and
rules-of-thumb in
setting the
vertical tracking
angle (VTA). One
raises the arm
just enough so
that the woven
material does not
contact the
record. Unlike
most cartridges,
Miyabi 47 is
optimized for what
is commonly called
positive VTA,
i.e., the front of
arm is lower than
the back. Pay
insufficient
attention to this
adjustment and you’ll
be muttering about
a $4000 needle.
Take the time and
get it right and
you’ll wonder
how 47 Labs
achieved this
level of realism
so inexpensively.
A
permanently
attached
flip-down,
old-fashioned
stylus guard
quells the anxiety
of accidentally
lunching a $3990
cartridge. With
tracking force set
at 2 grams and arm
height optimized,
tracking was
secure and
precise.
Note:
The alnico magnets
will attract
mounting tools and
nuts in a flash if
they get too near
the cartridge, so
extra care is
required when
bolting things up.
The
Phonocube is
available in two
versions: the 75dB
gain version I
auditioned with
the Miyabi 47, and
a +90dB version.
Since the Phono
Cube amplifies
current, one
applies the
formula: output
voltage of
cartridge divided
by its internal
impedance = output
in amperes. Sakura
Systems can help
in matching
cartridges if you
don’t know your
cartridge’s
output impedance.
There is no
provision for
moving magnet
cartridges. None
of the
resistive-loading
tweaks and tricks
of conventional
voltage amplifying
phono sections
apply. If you use
the Phonocube as
designed, running
it directly into
the Gaincard, the
correct gain
version is
critical. Among MC
cartridges that I
had on hand, the
Goldring Eroica LX
and the Talisman
Boron were close
enough to the
Miyabi 47 to get
reasonable though
not optimal
results, but the
Audio Technica AT
OC9’s current
output wouldn’t
allow use with the
75dB-gain version.
Since
the output of the
Phonocube drives
the Gaincard
amplifier
directly, Sakura
Systems recommends
using minimal
lengths of
interconnects and
speaker cables.
Being a true
dual-mono design,
the Gaincard
includes 2 muting
switches, 2 ground
screws, and dual
volume controls.
The latter are
ratchet types and
somewhat coarse in
gradation, but I
never found myself
wanting a volume
level in between
the click-stops.
My
reference Sound
Lab DynaStat
loudspeakers,
electrostatic/dynamic
hybrids, are an
easy 8-ohm load
and 88dB
efficient. I had
no concerns that
the Gaincard’s
25
watt-per-channel
output would be
insufficient to
drive them, having
had excellent
results with 30
watt-per-channel
tube amplifiers.
Though an
electrostatic
speaker’s
capacitive load
can produce
unpredictable
sonic results from
an amplifier, I
had no problem
driving the
DynaStats to my
normal 90dB volume
limit. 47 Labs
also makes a 50
watt-per-channel
version of the
Gaincard to for
less efficient
speakers. I also
briefly ran the
Gaincard into 4-
and 8-ohm dynamic
designs of 87 dB
sensitivity
(Infinity and
Spendor speakers).
WHY:
What, Where, How…
I
often use a
simple,
quasi-journalistic
scheme of
"What, Where,
How, and
Why," to aid
judging audio
gear. I want to
know
"WHAT"
the instrument is,
"WHERE"
it is located
within the sound
field,
"HOW" it
is being played,
and ultimately,
the musical
meaning –the
"WHY" of
it all.
I’ve
never heard a
group of
components as
sensitive to the
sonic effects of
different
interconnects,
speaker cable, and
tonearm set-up as
the 47 Labs. I
hauled out the
usual array of
interconnects and
speaker cables,
and since Sakura
Systems sells a
cabling kit that
utilizes a
solid-core design,
I used Analysis
Plus Oval 9
interconnects with
XLO speaker wire
for most of my
critical
listening.
To
my chagrin, I
realized that
setting the arm
height once was
not enough. Small
changes in record
thickness
necessitated
resetting the arm
to achieve optimum
performance. Being
just a tiny bit
off robbed the
sound of dynamics,
muddied the bass,
and either rolled
off or
disassociated the
highs from the
context of the
rest of the
frequencies. To be
blunt, resetting
the arm height (VTA)
for each record is
a royal pain in
the ass and I have
assiduously tried
to avoid it during
my LP-playing
life. To make LP
playback less
complicated, I set
the arm height to
suit the average
record thickness
of my LP
collection and I
fortunately had
the Ringmat Record
Support System to
save the day.
Consisting of a
Ringmat, an
anti-static mat, a
record damper, a
platter damper and
various plastic
platter-sized
shims of various
thicknesses, this
clever system
allows tuning
tonearm height to
the requisite
optimum by adding
or removing the
plastic shims.
While not exactly
a piece of cake,
it is much easier
to use than
changing the VTA
for each record.
It’s simple,
consistent, and
repeatable.
My
overwhelming first
impression of the
47 Lab phono
system is that the
quality of the
tonality and
dynamics of
instruments is
absolutely first
rate. Harmonics
are rich and full,
tonal colors are
vivid, and the
timbre is coherent
and extremely
life-like. If the
mantra for the SET
school is
"emotion,"
then the 47 Lab
phono systems’
is "Tonality,
Tonality,
Tonality."
The pure sensual
beauty of the
sound of a violin,
a cello, or a
double bass is so
exquisitely
rendered that one
starts comparing
their sound to
live rather than
to that of canned
music. Aiding this
revelatory
naturalness is the
exceptional
dynamic capability
and power in the
mid and low bass
– areas where
most reproduced
music is quite
anemic compared to
the live
performance.
Percussive bass
can be positively
concussive when
called for, and
yet is still full,
rich, and agile.
Ron Carter’s
piccolo bass was
unambiguously
distinguishable
from Buster
Williams’ double
bass on the Ron
Carter Quartet
recordings – a
doubly impressive
achievement since
the mix places the
two instruments in
virtually the same
central acoustic
space. Those
repelled by the
anorexic tonality
of some high-end
designs will love
this gear. Goodbye
Ally McBeal, hello
Sophia Loren!
Reproduction
of the recorded
acoustic and
general stereo
effects varies
with the quality
of the recording,
revealing both
processed, multi-miked
studio jobs, and
more organic
attempts to
recreate the live
concert
experience. Music
takes place in a
much larger area
than the physical
boundaries of the
speakers, and
while this
liberation from
physical
constraints may
nip incipient
claustrophobia and
induce ecstasy for
imaging freaks, I
don’t hold this
intriguing and
welcome effect to
be an absolute
necessity for
audio enjoyment.
It is, however, an
excellent
indication of
stereo separation
between channels
– one of the
benefits of
dual-mono design.
The soundstage can
be truly
breathtaking in
its width and
depth but presents
images that are
akin to a slightly
distant seating
perspective in a
classical concert
hall. Instrumental
separation and
focus does not
mimic front row
center.
Instrumental sound
and acoustic are
one, coherent and
complete.
Instrumental size
is very
convincing,
especially on
panel speakers.
Did you know that
Miles Davis was
shorter than John
Coltrane? You’ll
know it with this
system. While
quality of
pressings and
wear-&-tear on
records is
audible, it is
never unduly
spotlighted.
Surface noise and
pops/ticks are
subdued and
isolated, lying on
an imaginary
invisible plane at
the speakers. The
system extracts
the maximum tonal
pleasure from the
recording. This is
to be applauded.
What’s the point
of a
hyper-analytical
etched system that
does nothing but
tell you how bad
every recording
and pressing is?
Combo
jazz, rock and
roll, and smaller
ensemble classical
chamber music are
served
particularly well.
Musically relevant
detail is
naturally
presented with no
exaggeration of
extra-musical
artifacts.
Identifying the
style and sonic
signature of
individual artists
is a snap. Ever
been confused as
to who’s
Coltrane and who’s
Cannonball Adderly
on "Kind of
Blue"? Or
which guitar is
Dickie Betts’
and which is Duane
Allman’s?
Goodbye confusion!
Vocals and the
articulation of
lyrics are
particularly
wonderful. It
deeply annoys me
when hi-fi gear
slurs and blurs
lyrics. This is
not a problem with
the 47 Lab system
as even notorious,
buried-in-the-mix,
mumbling vocalists
are easily
understood.
In
three extremely
important areas
for me, the 47
Labs system is
among the best I’ve
ever heard:
reproducing the
violin, the piano,
and in the
articulation of
lyrics. I despair
when these things
aren’t done
right, as
listening fatigue
quickly sets in
and the illusion
of music is easily
punctured. Screw
up the violin, the
voice, and the
piano and you’ve
pretty much
eliminated the
entire classical
corpus of music.
Although
I find some other
products to be
more explicit in
rendering the
artistic meaning
of a performance,
the 47 Lab system
does fairly well
with the HOW:
tension and
release, call and
response, subtle
dynamic shadings
and nuances of
note articulation.
Rhythmic coherence
is somewhat
variable though.
Gentle swinging
rhythms are better
rendered than
complex driven and
polyrhythmic
meters. Points of
arrival, phrasing,
and the general
punctuation of
series of notes
are good but not
exceptional, even
with my gaggle of
rhythm-master
turntables.
Extreme
high-frequency
response, while
integrated into
the sonic fabric,
does not produce
the sense of
stratospheric
overtones and
sometimes softens
the bell-like
clarity of
triangles and
harps in
orchestral music
and can dull the
rasp of brass.
This effect seems
likely to be
partly the sonic
signature of the
Miyabi 47
cartridge (or
perhaps its
sensitivity to
slight VTA
errors). Other
cartridges I ran
through the
Phonocube did not
show the effect
quite as strongly.
Those who find the
rising
high-frequency
response of many
moving coil
cartridges
annoying and
unnatural need
have no worries
about the Miyabi
47.
And
yes, I did listen
to each 47
Laboratory
component in other
equipment
contexts. While
the basic
abilities of each
component were
still
identifiable, the
total effect was
somewhat
diminished. While
using the
Phonocube as a
conventional phono
stage and running
it through an
active line preamp
might lessen
concerns of
adequate gain, the
sonic contribution
of the preamp will
complicate and
distort the
picture to some
extent. Running
the Gaincard amp
with an active
preamp presented
no problems, nor
did the Miyabi 47
loaded into a
conventional phono
stage (provided
that the 0.3 mV
output can be
accommodated). The
complete phono
system, however,
was never matched
by any other
combination of
components. This
is definitely a
case of system
design working
harmoniously
together.
There
has been an
ongoing
alternative to the
hyper-detailed,
etched, and
clinical
reproduction of
many high-end
products. Its most
vocal
manifestation has
been the rise of
the low-powered,
single-ended
triode tube
movement.
Significantly,
this movement
originated in
Japan. Valuing
emotion, tonality,
and an organic
presentation of
the music, the
movement questions
the musical value
of highly analytic
systems that tell
you everything
about a recording
except what the
music means. The
sterility of much
CD playback was
perhaps an impetus
for this trend.
Junji Kimura
founded 47
Laboratory with
the original
specific purpose
of trying to get
CD playback to
exhibit the
naturalness that
the best analogue
takes as a given.
Interestingly,
Kimura’s designs
have found high
favor in the SET
world, doubly
important
considering that
solid-state
designs are akin
to heresy in this
tube-oriented
world.
While
I find the 47 Lab’s
reproduction of
the WHAT to be of
reference quality
and the WHERE to
be consistently
engaging, I
yearned for a bit
more articulation
of the HOW. This
was particularly
true for me in
very rhythmically
complex types of
music but also
held true for
basic musical
dialogue: it was
almost as if the
system was
limiting musical
speech to commas
and periods. I
yearned for a
closer rendering,
a more complexly
punctuated view of
the music. Thus
the WHY of the
performance fell
somewhat short of
the best I have
heard. My wife
however, who holds
a Music degree in
Piano Performance,
found no problem
with the
punctuation and
rhythmic abilities
of the 47 Lab
phono system.
Perhaps listeners
like me, who do
not play an
instrument, need
more articulation
and explicitness
than those who, in
a sense, hear the
music from the
inside.
Since
47 Lab does not
make a
loudspeaker,
turntable, and
tone arm, grasping
Kimura’s total
concept of what
audio should sound
like is somewhat
incomplete. I, for
one, would be
extremely
interested in
further 47 Lab
products that
would compose a
complete system.
I
finished my
listening to the
47 Laboratory
phono system on
Mardi Gras and
sadly shipped it
back to Sakura
Systems on Ash
Wednesday. After
becoming
acquainted with
its riotous, lush
and rich tonal
balance, life
without it is like
the gray sullen
season of Lent. If
the rich pleasures
of Fat Tuesday
appeal more to you
than the
hair-shirt
austerities of
dim-gray
self-denial, the
47 Lab system is
for you.

|