| The Ascendo System (M)agic
Loudspeaker |
|
1.
Ma-gic. The
art that purports to control or forecast
natural events, effects, or forces by
invoking the supernatural. 2. The practice
of using Ascendo System M loudspeakers to
attempt to produce supernatural effects or
control events in nature. 3 The exercise
of sleight of hand or conjuring for
entertainment.
|
|
May 2004
|

Hailing from Germany, the Ascendo System Z is a new an
unusually musical transducer that has electrified
nearly all who sat before it. After living with the
Ascendo System Z loudspeaker as reference, displacing
the mighty Talon Khorus MkII’s, my long time favorite,
I purchased them without hesitation. Of all its
world-class strengths;―sound staging, image
specificity and density, along with an extremely
smooth and yet detailed presentation―I discovered
there was one area that I thought could be improved
upon (long after I purchased them). That one area was
bass impact. To be honest, bass impact is not really
something one immediately asks of a loudspeaker so
utterly capable of delivering the kinds of musical
excellence audiophiles seek. But having lived with and
been spoiled by what I can only describe as bass
monsters like the Talon Khorus, I was finding myself
itching for a similar level of bass from the Ascendos.
Sometimes life can make it hard differentiating one’s
wants from one’s needs. I certainly didn’t need more
bass impact. I only wanted it.
Enter the flagship Ascendo
System M
What you get in equal portions when you switch to this
bigger version of the Ascendo is world class dynamics
and musicality. At $40,000 ($45k
with chrome stands), the Ascendo System M
rests smack dab in the middle of what essentially
becomes world class category: capable of reproducing
sonics without making any apologies for lack of bass
prowess, treble extension, soundstage (depth, height
and width, etcetera, etcetera). I still laugh at
recommended components costing tens of thousands,
given top honors yet attached is a note that they are
low-frequency restricted! At the end of the day one
can only sit stupefied.
Lets Get Physical

The Ascendo System M and Z models are
both equipped with the same external metal bridge
which is designed to both support the ribbon tweeter
right above the midrange/bass section, and to expunge
all unwanted resonances [mine
arriving in the more expensive shiny chrome finish.
See photo]. The only difference between the
Systems Z and the M can be
seen when you look at the midrange/woofer enclosure.
The tweeter and midrange drivers (8” SEAS) are
identical in both models. What makes the System M more
expensive is its substantially larger woofer: an 11”
Eton nestled in its belly, versus the 8” woofer housed
in the System Z. This gives the System Z a more
slender look, making it more of an eye catcher and
thus more WAF friendly.
In terms of sensitivity, there are also differences.
The nominal impedance of the System M, for example, is
a rated at 8 ohms compared to the System Z’s rated 5
ohms. Sensitivity can be critical depending on the
amplifier used.
Located under each midrange driver are the vent ports,
and again the System M sports a noticeably larger (5
1/2” diameter) port, compared to the System Z’s 4”.
Both loudspeakers use the same crossover employing
Ascendo’s unique S.A.S.B. low-frequency drive unit (or
dynamic current-damped woofer and semisymmetrical
bandpass) technology. (Stromdynamisch, the German term
for current-damped, allows for the 8" SEAS Excel paper
cone midrange, which is housed in a dedicated sealed
box, to remain electrically damped and matched in
impedance with the internally hidden 11” bass driver).
On the rear of the midrange/bass

enclosure of both loudspeakers is
toggle, switching between VD-H (Verstärkerdämpfung
hoch) and VD-N (Verstärkerdämpfung niedrig). Switching
between these settings will affect the speaker's
sensitivity relative to the damping factor of
amplifier used (i.e., a highly damped amplifier =
VD-H, lower damped = VD-N, the “normal” setting). As
with the System Z, I ultimately preferred the normal
setting and for the life of me could hardly tell you
what the differences were when I switched to the VD-H
setting. I have a sneaky suspicion it doesn’t matter
as much using digital amps and hybrids such as the Bel
Canto, Acoustic Reality and Chateau Research.
In terms of hookup, again both speakers are equipped
with same plastic encased,
Euro-styled WBT binding
posts for tweeter and midrange/bass. Bi-wiring is
mandatory while bi-amping is optional. Physically,
aside from the larger mid/bass section of the System
M, it would be difficult, if not impossible, at a
glance to tell both loudspeakers apart. So, then I
ask, why invest in the bigger System M?
Don’t Disturb This Groove
The Ascendo System M simply sounds bigger, and in my
humble opinion, in part due to its larger woofer and
greater sensitivity, better. The TacT 2150 amplifiers
sound better driving the larger System M than they did
on the smaller and slightly less efficient System Zs.
Don’t get the impression they sounded strained on the
System Z because they did not. But there was certainly
more ease and effortlessness when the amplifiers were
strapped to the larger sibling.
When I listened to the opening of Dance of the Seven
Veils from Salome from the Exotic Dances CD (Reference
Recording RR71CD), I knew immediately that the System
M possessed bass that was both deeper and possessed of
more low-end impact. By virtue of these strengths I
got the benefit of a greater (perceived)
three-dimensionality in the lower regions as well.
Three-dimensional low end? When your aural senses
detect something like that, you know something special
is going on.
Pianist Jacky Terrasson’s funky smooth jazz remake of Stevie
Wonder’s Isn’t She Lovely from his Smile CD (Bluenote
7243540668) serves as a near perfect illustration of deep, three dimensional bass. Bassist Sean Smith
does a worthy job of handling
multi-rhythmic tempo with his unique
playing style, while Terrasson tickles the ivories in
his own inimitable way. Overall, I like the way they
sound together, and the mixing of this disc was
excellently done, which makes this
CD a “Must Getz” (the
new title of our recommended jazz CDs).
Three dimensional bass is not some figment of
imagination but one measure of what is possible when
engineering and science are joined in a firm
handshake. I think there was a lot of handshaking
going on at Ascendo when you consider the integration
of the crossover network and three drivers. This
integration sounds flawless to my ears, and the TacT
equipment is able to weave its magic completely in the
digital realm, through both its room correction preamp
and D/A conversion, before the signal is rendered
analogue. In theoretical terms, this is supposed to be
the best of what is possible via the digital approach.
And to my ears it very well may be.
Dare to Compare
Greg Petan owns the Talon Firebird and his most recent
review tells of his admiration for the make, feel and
sonic character of this most audacious loudspeaker.
Greg and I are not just audiophiles who write for the
same rag, but two friends who value each other’s
opinions and attitudes. It is with this in mind that I
say the Talon Firebird is an awesome loudspeaker that
will dazzle anyone that’s wealthy enough to afford
them, and all the ancillary equipment needed to make
them sing. Ditto the Ascendo. At $32k, ($40K with the
Diamond tweeter) the Firebird isn’t even remotely
affordable to most of us. Sadly, though, it seems more
and more loudspeakers today are being priced in this
range. I mention ancillary equipment because I believe
that both these speakers will pick up on lesser
component flaws, so fine equipment with very high
synergistic characteristics become a must. (Far too
often, super-heavyweight systems sound bad because
someone went out and bought all highly touted products
without ever once considering whether they’d work well
together.)
Greg and I have systems that are very different, so my
impressions are based only on what I heard on Greg’s
equipment when I’m over for a listening session. I
like the Talon Firebirds. I like them a lot more in
Greg’s setup. I think they do exactly what Greg finely
illustrates in his review. The Firebirds possess the
incredible ability to create the illusion that live
instruments are in the room, which is something I’ve
always craved and tried to recreate in my own
listening room. Greg’s room, which is humongous,
allows him certain privileges and freedoms that my
relatively quaint setup (17’ by 21’ with an 8’
ceiling) simply does not.
Quaint does have its advantages when it comes to
intimacy. The ability to feel as if you’re at one with
the music is more apparent due to my setup being a
strictly dedicated one, with only a pair of windows
keeping the world out. Everything is quieter and
closer than at Greg’s, so the ability to get lost in
the music tends to be easier. This gives the
impression of the System M possessing more resolution,
which is something Greg and I both spoke of. I think
the Firebirds are simply too big for my room. Their
personality isn’t characteristically subtle. They want
to sing, and you probably are going to need the space
to let them do just that. The Ascendo are much more
laid-back sounding, due in part to its ribbon tweeter.
The System M sound is much more reminiscent of the
planar designs than designs employing dynamic drivers.
As a result the sound is unusually relaxed but at the
same time alive, but not too close-up and personal.
This comes as a big plus in a room the size of mine.
The Ascendos literally make my room sound bigger than
its true physical size. Hard to explain, but easy to
hear.
On the other hand, the Ascendos could not keep up with
the insanely high levels of playback as the Firebirds.
Both play louder than they should ever be required to.
But the Gryphon Encore amplifier, rated at something
like 500 watts per side, driving the Firebirds is
something to behold. They epitomize the meaning of
“driving” a loudspeaker.
Both these loudspeakers will delight their respective
owners with hours of listening pleasure. The Ascendo
is not very well known around these parts while the
Talon has gained a stronghold in the past couple of
years. My hope is that Ascendo will develop into these
regions with a strong marketing approach. Their design
team possesses the obvious expertise to make
loudspeakers throughout their line, from the smallest
to the largest, that have that signature Ascendo
sound: warm, relaxed and utterly involving, without
the slightest hint of distortion. Most recently the
Ascendo C5 loudspeakers arrived for review and,
amazingly, without employing a ribbon tweeter this
loudspeakers sounds exactly like the larger Ascendos…minus
a couple of lower octaves.
If I had to choose one I would have to go with my
heart and pick Ascendo for its ability to remain
unfazed and relaxed no matter the source. Add to that
a ribbon tweeter which has to be one of the best
high-frequency transducers made today.
Hey, $40,000 is a lot of dough for anything, much less
a loudspeaker! That was the required down payment on
my house. Why, for that amount of bread I could go on
a world cruise and take the family…and a couple of
relatives. But this is the high-end, whose very name
bespeaks grandeur, pomposity and very large piles of
greenbacks. And the System M has been appointed
high-end, in the truest sense of the word, by
virtually everyone who has heard it.
Granted, the System M isn’t going to fit most tastes
in décor, with the exception of the audiophile who
finds the look of this most unusual loudspeaker as
attractive as I do. Mine is in a dedicated room so I
don’t have to worry about looks. But there’s no
question that the Ascendo M is an exceptionally
domineering presence in one’s living quarters. In
terms of performance the Ascendo System M resides as
the most musically satisfying loudspeakers to have
graced my listening room. It hasn’t skipped a beat no
matter the musical venue, electronics or digital
format. As a matter of fact, the Ascendo System M
seems to crave high resolution devices. Case in point:
Alex Paychev’s modified Philips 1000 SACD player. Playing SACD’s through this
modified mechanism
opened greater possibilities for both SACD as well as
what this very capable loudspeaker is MORE capable of.
Certainly there’s going to be something to replace the
Ascendos as technology continues to move forward. But
I must state that this is one that may go down as an
ageless classic, like the Infinity RS1B’s, the Maggie
Tympanies’, and the Quad ESL’s have. The Ascendo
System M certainly has earned my highest accolades.
|
Specifications
Principle:
Three way SASB-technology
(dynamic–current–damped woofer
and semisymmetrical bandpass)
Design:
modular:
discoupled mounting of speaker,
variable time–alignment for listening
positions between 50 and 190 cm
over floor
Material:
stainless steel, low–resonance wood /
bitumen sandwich housing
Dimensions: (B/H/T):
Stand: 40 / 128,5 / 60 cm
Loudspeaker:
29 / 148,5 / 35cm
Loudspeaker+Stand:
40 / 156,0 / 60cm
Weight:
95.5 Kg
Impedance:
5-Ohms
Sensitivity:
87 dB / 1W/m
Price:
$40,000 /with chrome stand $45,000 |
|
|
 |