| Jonathan’s
Best
Foote
Forward |
| Commentary |
| Jonathan
Foote |
| November
2001 |
In
thinking back
over my
meteoric rise
to Mach 5-fame
in the Empire
of Audiophilia
(upon which
the sun never
sets), I’m
mindful of the
question fans
most often
ask.
"Jonathan,
where do I
apply for
balls like
yours?"
Nowhere,
foolish
interlocutor!
They’re a
gift from the
Almighty.
Along with my
striking good
looks and
luck.
"Jonathan,
in that review
where you
actually
endorse the
amazingly
dollar’d CD
transport with
the bit of
string, what
most pleased
you about the
device?"
Why,
the very bit
of string you
mention,
foolish
interlocutor.
As I tried to
make clear in
my review (can
you people not
read?!), the
string’s
provenance
profoundly
affects the
transport’s
sound. I got a
quite
remarkably
different
result when I
tweaked the
amazingly
dollar’d
transport with
a length of
coarse thread
from a
penitent’s
hair shirt.
Whatever I
played, the
silliest
stuff, seemed
suddenly
serious,
astringent
even –
bitter,
distraught.
Substituting
the penitent’s
coarse thread
with another
from the
vertical
aspect of
Britney Spear’s
(unlaundered)
G-string, I
heard that
which I
hesitate to
describe lest
I become
irreversibly
aroused.
Butt-floss in
general does
the trick,
thought not
(of course) to
the degree I
experience.
"Jonathan,
why is it that
you never
complain about
the price tags
of the stuff
you write
about?"
Conditioning.
It’s all
about
conditioning.
And wrists. It’s
also all in
the wrists. I’m
a Monopoly
collector –
the game, I
mean. Started
when I was a
kid. I’ve
got about 300
sets in a
whole lot of
languages.
When you
shuffle
through as
much Monopoly
money as I’ve
handled, a
$25,000-plus
CD transport
that uses
string doesn’t
seem such a
stretch. (I
made a little
funny there.
Hope you’re
not too stupid
to have picked
up on it.) It
also helps to
have had a
guided tour
through a
multi-national
bank’s
platinum
reserves. Boy,
talk about
stacked!
(Stacked. Get
it? Snicker,
snicker.) One
or two of
those little
bricks buys
the hottest
system you can
think of.
Nothing’s
beyond reach
or indeed
implausible if
only you’re
willing to
fantasize.
"Jonathan,
have you ever
reviewed a
piece of
super-expensive
gear you
thought was a
rip-off?"
Not
possible. I
call that kind
of thinking
subversive.
Un-Audiophilian.
Terroristic,
even. Who sent
you? Security!
|