| The Music Hall Maverick SACD/CD
Player |
| A
Release from Music Hell |
| |
|
September 2005 |

I’ve always had high regard for Roy Hall of
Music Hall. Blessed with a wry irreverence and
ironic sense of humor, he is refreshingly free
of High End pretension. The UK products that
he imports and distributes in the USA - Creek
Audio and Epos speakers - have always been
benchmark musical communicators, reasonably
priced and so musically adroit that one
wonders why anyone would spend more. Roy’s
Music Hall private label offers a complete
line of Europe-sourced turntables and tonearms
that have become lynchpins in the
affordable-priced turntable market. The Music
Hall brand is also home to some exceptional CD
players of which the Maverick, at $1495, is
the most expensive. The Maverick offers SACD
and up-sampled playback of conventional CD’s.
No one can accuse me of being a CD enthusiast.
For the first dozen years of the CD’s
existence I couldn’t stand being in the same
room with it, the sound providing dictionary
examples of “harsh,” “grating,” “artificial,”
and “nasty.” Even more loathsome was the
format’s effect on music. Instrumental timbre
was false, instruments emerged from incoherent
amorphous space and played without rhythm,
shading, phrasing or subtle dynamic variation.
I used to use John Coltrane and Jimi Hendrix
as my primary references whenever a new CD
player claimed to have perfected the perfect
sound forever. Since the music of these too
giants could change the universe (and create
and destroy it too) it was the perfect test
for CD. Any playback format that ruined the
fire and cosmic energy of this music was
worthless, nay criminal, to this music lover.
Thanks to the late Hunter S. Thompson it is
almost impossible to use the word loathing
without adding the word fear. When it
became clear that the CD was here to stay and
that its marketing strategy involved killing
off the analogue LP, the end of recorded music
as I knew it threatened. My strategy was to
buy as many LPs as I could get my filthy
dollars around and wait until the whole
loathsome CD thing blew over. I bought over
5,000 LPs (fortunately my listening was almost
exclusively classical at the time) and waited
for CD to either improve, or for a new format
to supplant it.
Watching CD players evolve over the past two
decades was to experience tragedy and comedy
simultaneously. Super-expensive CD players
became obsolete almost overnight as new
chipsets and CD transports developed for mass
market products made them pointless and
non-repairable. Future archaeologists are
going to wonder about the weird phenomenon of
the 1980’s and 1990’s of using strange and
heavy electronic devices to prop doors open,
anchor fishing boats, and to keep pet rhinos
in check.
By the mid-90’s, CD players had improved to
the point where absence of aural pain was no
longer the prime criterion for player quality.
Whether this was due to better studio
encoders, the improvement of chipsets, the
identification of jitter as a prime culprit
for the format’s a-musicality, or simply
Orpheus showing mercy to long-suffering music
lovers and leading them out of musical hell is
difficult to say. But whatever Audio Alchemy
did to voodoo the signal to 18 bits in their
DTI Pro 149 suddenly produced sound that could
be identified as being played by instruments.
I personally had despaired of it ever
happening.
As attempts to reduce jitter became more
successful, and over/up sampling chipsets
evolved, and manufacturers started applying
the basics of intelligent power supply design
and component isolation techniques within the
chassis, the format finally started becoming
viable. Although descriptions of sonic quality
and musical performance were always asterisked
by “for CD” and the inevitable “but not as
good as analogue,” intermediate-priced CD
players started becoming a safe bet. The
rationale for investing in a state-of-the-art
player was more or less stopped in its tracks
by the emergence of the two new higher
resolution digital formats – SACD and DVD-A –
which made buying an all-out and very
expensive CD-only player a high risk for
future boat anchor duty. Consequently I did
not invest heavily in CD players, nor did I
build up a library of CDs.
None of this is new or profound. Many music
lovers did the same. And I suspect many now
face the same dilemma: buy a high-quality
CD-only player, or buy a multi-format and
almost pocket change-priced universal player
spinning onto the market from the home theater
world. Those intensely annoyed by the Big
Brother/ 1984 marketing that launched and
solidified the CD, can only laugh at the
half-assed incompetence of SACD and DVD-A
promotion. Ask mass-market music stores about
the two super formats and the response is too
often bovine ignorance or very slim pickings.
Even Internet searching shows little SACD or
DVD-A availability other than re-issue titles
that one likely already owns in LP and CD
format. Certainly the generation that grew up
with CD as their default has no interest in a
higher fidelity digital format: the low-rez
compressed MP3 rules the roost. And despite
claims that multi-channel music and video
playback are the wave of the future (and
mass-market schlockmongers stocking
nothing else as if to guarantee it) nobody I
know owns, or even wants, a multi-channel HT
system.
I approached the Maverick as primarily an
up-sampling CD player, with SACD and straight
CD as garnishes. Certainly the difference
between straight CD and upsampling on this
player was marked enough sonically to make
upsampling the default way to go. Played thus,
the Maverick is a very refined and subtle CD
player, capable of great finesse, grace and
nuance. These abilities are so rare in CD
players that they bear emphasizing and
admiration. Many CD players that are free from
edge and harshness also gloss over the subtle
details of musical performance that help
ascertain artistry and quality of the
music-making. The Maverick is refreshingly
free of this dumbing-down of the signal: the
player is no Muzak-like, milksop anodyne.
Reproduction of the frequency bandwidth is of
one piece: tight, dynamic bass flows into an
articulate mid-band with excellent lyric
intelligibility and up into an edge-free yet
transient-coherent top end. The top end
doesn’t accentuate the CD’s limited high
frequency response: there’s no feeling of
being of being six foot tall in a room with
seven foot ceilings. Most important though is
the Maverick’s ability to track rhythms and to
lay out the architecture of the music so that
each instrument’s contribution arrives on time
and in sync with the larger movement of the
music. This is as important in reproducing The
Meters as it is in reproducing Mozart’s wind
concerti, and has been the bane of CD players
in the past. Yes, the asterisk still applies,
and the Maverick lagged behind my analogue
sources, but the Maverick did allow that
internal movement with the music that often
flowers physically into air guitar, drums,
violin, accordion and krumhorn.
SACD playback was a significant notch up in
fidelity and naturalness. Donovan’s spoken
introduction to Atlantis was so clearly
articulated that those wanting to learn the
Scots purr and burr accent could use the
Maverick as a reference teaching aid. Since I
had LP versions of the dozen SACD’s I used for
audition, instant comparisons were available.
SACD playback was very good indeed, though
still outdone by analogue LP’s better sense of
timing, rhythm, accent, punctuation, and flow.
I
did not feel the need to apologize for the
Maverick though: its unraveling of Dave
Brubeck’s Time Out showed excellent
articulation of the music’s unusual time
signatures, and with the late Olatunji’s
polyrhythmic Drums of Passion, I found
that I could follow seven different rhythms
simultaneously. It was much easier to do with
analogue LP, but since much of the dreck
foisted upon us as “High End” cannot even do
one rhythm right, the Maverick deserves
special praise. One clear advantage of the
SACD was better bass clarity and bandwidth
compared to bass-filtered LP’s: the phantom
bass players of many 50’s and 60’s jazz
recordings were suddenly incarnate, and making
their full contribution to the musical
argument.
About the only weakness of the Maverick was
its slight reticence to fully express raunchy,
lewd and pulsing music with the proper
lasciviousness and filth. While you could feel
the Funk, you couldn’t quite smell it.
Playing CD without over-sampling helped a bit
here. Evoking the other musical chakras
was so good however that one can easily
forgive overlook this slight deficiency. The
grace, resolution, and subtlety of the
Maverick allow partnering it with very
sophisticated electronics and speakers.
My main issue with digital has been the
technology’s weakness in tracking the initial
transient of a note, its flowering, and its
decay accurately. Since the perception of
music depends on getting this right, it’s no
surprise much digital sounds so a-musical.
Timbre in particular suffers from weak
tracking of the transient envelope. My final
test with review gear is often to just sit
back and ask, “Does that really sound like the
instrument?” Straight CD playback allowed the
‘CD-ishness’ to be slightly audible;
over-sampled CD placed it near the threshold
of perception (I had to consciously listen for
it); SACD was quite good. Though the asterisk
still applies.
The Maverick wasn’t fussy about set-up; its
individual feet, each of which consists of
multiple smaller pods, provide effective
isolation. Using state-of-the-art isolation
systems (the Townshend 3-D Seismic Sink, the
Ganymede VCS, and the Stillpoints Universal
Resonance Dampers and Component Stand) did not
produce the wholesale transmogrification they
do on most components, so I played the
Maverick ‘neat.’ After screwing around with
various aftermarket power cords, I found that
they did not improve the Maverick’s music
making and so used the supplied item. The
inexpensive and supremely musically coherent
DNM Solid-Core and the Origin Live Reference
interconnects produced both wonderful sound
and deeply communicative music. One won’t need
to invest another $2000 to get the Maverick to
sing.
The Maverick is an excellent SACD/CD player at
any price. At $1495 it is very attractive
indeed and a must-listen for anyone searching
for musical results without investing in
future landfill fodder. Thanks, Roy for
another great product.
Paul Szabady
________________
Specifications:
• Top grade Sony SACD decoder chip, CXD2752
• 24-bit/96kHz Upsampling via Crystal CS8420
sample rate converter
• Burr-Brown PCM1738 24-bit/192kHz DAC for
standard CD and SACD
• Rigid full aluminum chassis and faceplate
• Sony KHM 234AAA laser head and servo system
• 2 transformers provide separate power to the
analog and digital systems
• Vibration-canceling dimpled rubber feet
• Remote controllable standby/power function
• Easily readable and dimmable florescent
display
Price: $1495
Address:
H MUSIC HALL
108 STATION ROAD,
GREAT NECK, NY,
11023
Tel: 516 487 3663
Fax: 516 773 3891
Email:
info@musichallaudio.com
Website:
http://www.musichallaudio.com

|