|
Acoustic Zen
Hologram Speaker
Cable, Silver
Reference and Matrix
Interconnects |
|
Another Perspective |
|
Dan
Dzuban |
|
6 August
2002 |
Specifications
Silver
Reference Interconnect
7N Zero Crystal Silver
1 meter, w/RCA plug
Retail: $948.00
Matrix Reference
Interconnect
6N Zero Crystal Copper
with Silver
1 meter, w/RCA plug
Retail: $498.00
Hologram Speaker Cable
8 AWG, 6N Zero Crystal
Copper
8 Ft. Mono Pair
Retail:
$1,048.00
Address:
Acoustic Zen
Technologies
800 Los Vallecitos Blvd.
Suite P
San Marcos, CA 92069
Telephone: (760)
471-4899
Website:
www.acousticzen.com
Comrade Appel didn't
mince words in his
April 2002 review
of Acoustic Zen's
Hologram speaker cable
and Krakatoa power
cable. So why beat a
dead horse? Unlike Mr.
Appel, I did not have
any exposure to other
Acoustic Zen
products,
so my perspective was
not to see whether the
company could outdo its
earlier designs. Rather,
I just wanted to see
what all the fuss was
about.
Buzz, Buzz,
Buzz…
One of my
pet peeves is the
often-misunderstood
difference between hype
and buzz. The way I see
it, buzz is the
excitement generated by
word of mouth followed
by media recognition
when a particular
product or service is of
exceptional merit. Hype
is buzz's evil twin, or
maybe hype is Bizarro-world
buzz; it is less about
genuine excitement, and
more about attention,
albeit unwarranted. It
is instead conjured up,
first in public
relations or marketing
departments and then
eventually reaching the
media. Buzz is an
indication of enduring
value, whereas hype is
here today and gone
tomorrow.
As American consumers,
generally we have come
to understand the
difference between buzz
and hype on an intuitive
level. Teenagers,
however, have not yet
honed this skill. An
example would be the
difference between the
Backstreet Boys and
James Taylor, or Phantom
Menace and the original
Star Wars.
Acoustic Zen products
have gotten quite a bit
of exposure in the
audiophile media world
lately, including some
rave reviews here in the
Stereo Times. I could
not help but wonder how
much was genuine buzz
and how much was merely
hype. I am happy to
report that Acoustic
Zen's cable and
interconnects are worthy
of their buzz. In fact,
I second brother Appel's
enthusiasm.
Humble
Beginnings
Initially,
all was not so
clear-cut. My first
impression of the cables
was not positive. In
fact, out of the box,
they sounded horrible.
So bad that I really
have no recollection of
how they sounded other
than that they were so
glare-ridden and harsh
that I could barely
stomach to keep them in
my system. My only
thought at that point
was not whether they
were worthy of buzz, but
if even hype would be
unsustainable with sound
this bad. Ultimately
both the cables and
interconnects required
an inordinate amount of
break in time.
Furthermore, the
difference in sound was
inordinately dramatic.
Only after I let them
run all day and night
for a week did they
start to sound bearable,
and only after a month
did they hint at being
worthy of all the press
they have garnered.
Robert Lee, of Acoustic
Zen suggested that the
best way to experience
the potential of his
cabling was to wire the
entire signal chain with
his cable. Furthermore,
he added that mixing a
Matrix Interconnect with
a Silver Reference was
preferable to going
entirely with Silver
Reference. Being the
bright-eyed,
bushy-tailed reviewer
that I am, I did just
that.
Comparison
I first
replaced my reference
Monster Cable Sigma
Retro Gold
interconnects. The
Sigmas are a mighty fine
sounding cable. Their
marketing literature
claims that their design
was influenced by the
golden era of tube gear,
giving them a warm,
full-bodied sound. I had
thought them to be
relatively neutral, but
compared to the
Matrix/Silver Reference
combo, the Sigmas did
seem to sound a bit
tube-like. I didn't hear
a difference in bass,
but the Sigmas seemed to
possess a bit softer
focus than the 'Zen
cables. The 'Zen's modus
operandi was laser focus
coupled with an
expansive soundstage.
The Sigmas seemed to
give sonic images a bit
more body, but the Zens
presented their images
more clearly. I never
thought the Sigmas
sounded rolled off, but
they didn't seem to have
as much air to their
highs as did the 'Zens.
The Zens seemed to be a
bit crisper sounding,
but I can't say that
they were tipped up or
hot.
I then replaced my
Harmonic Technology Pro
9 speaker cable with the
Acoustic Zen Hologram
speaker cable. The
differences here were a
bit more difficult to
pick out. I got less of
a sense of a difference
in tonal character than
I did in image
character; the Holograms
presented a larger and
more distinct soundfield.
What has always stuck
out to me regarding the
Harmonic Technology
cable was its purity.
The Hologram didn't
sound less "pure" when
compared to the Harmonic
Technology, but purity
didn't seem to be the
priority of the
Hologram. The purity was
there if I listened for
it, but unless I was
listening for it, the
clarity of individual
sound sources within the
soundstage was what
stuck out.
As a
Whole
At the
level of performance of
the Sigmas, the Harmonic
Technologies and the 'Zens,
many of the differences
are a matter of personal
taste rather than an
objective "better or
worse." I had been
pretty happy with my
cables, along with the
Bel Canto Evo 200.4 amp
and Quad ESL-989
loudspeaker, feeling
that my cabling was not
a bottleneck to the
system's overall
performance. I still
feel that they are not a
bottleneck per se, but
the 'Zen cables
strengthened numerous
attributes in my system
that are more in tune
with my personal
preferences. If you want
tonal purity, the Quads
can give it to you like
few others, and both the
MC Sigmas and HT Pro 9's
seem to cater to that.
However, I found that
the Quads are capable of
giving me a clearer view
into a larger soundstage
when paired with the
Acoustic Zen cables. For
me, this was a good
thing, or should I say a
"clear benefit."
Similarly, the Quads are
extremely transparent,
so that while the Sigma
and Harmonic Tech cables
gave my system a bit
more warmth and body,
the 'Zen cables made up
for it by being so clean
that the harmonic
textures of the Evo amp
could come through on
their own. This was a
good thing as well.
The Acoustic Zen cables
sit in an interesting
market niche. They are
expensive enough to be
on the cusp of the
lunacy/cost-no-object
category, which would
make them a bargain if
they can in fact compete
performance-wise in this
category. But they are
also at the point of
inflection for
diminishing returns,
meaning that in
real-world terms you
will have to spend much
more money to get any
even slight increase in
performance. I cannot
comment on how they
stand up to
cost-no-object designs;
for that I will take
Martin at his word. All
I can say is that the
Acoustic Zen cables and
interconnects displaced
some top-notch
performers in my system,
and succeeded in
bringing out the best in
my system in areas that
I thought I had
previously pushed to the
limit. And that, my
friends, is a feat
worthy of buzz.

|