| Music Hall Mambo Integrated
Amplifier By Shanling Audio |
|
|
|
Ron
Nagle
April 2004
|

If you are an audiophile and a reporter attending the
2004 CES in Las Vegas, you couldn’t possibly cover
everything there. Even now, months after the show has
ended I still marvel at the thousands of incredible
grown up “boy toys” I saw. Every possible audio
interest was represented, from the mundane to the,
frankly, weird. Case in point, I watched as two pairs
of Bang & Olufsen “space ship” style speakers battled
it out over room equalization rights. These speakers
generate test tones and have built in microphones,
they run an acoustic room compensation program. But
you cannot do two pairs at the same time, they pick up
each other’s test signals and they never lock on. At
the B&O press conference flashing lights and beeping
sounds were bouncing back and forth like a crazed
tennis match until somebody finally pulled out the
plug. This year as usual I hung out mostly at the
Alexis Park Hotel where the Hi-End was happening and
where the best toys were. That’s also where my sore
feet and me stopped in at room AP2310, to talk to an
old acquaintance, the very affable Roy Hall. I think
Roy has an uncanny instinct for finding the very best
value for the money audio components worldwide. I
would never think to pass him by. His interests always
seem to run parallel to mine.
Love or Lust?
Like a proud papa, Roy showed me around
his room and explained in great detail the
improvements he made in his new top of the line MM-9
turntable. I was impressed. But it was his new, milled
by computer control, massively made Mambo integrated
amplifier that caught my eye. The shiny aluminum
chassis beckoned me. I ran my fingers over its satiny
cover and caressed its hot heat sinks, as a wave of
audiophile lust washed over me. The finely tooled
casework bespeaks quality and the inside echoes the
very same qualities. Beautifully laid out and
executed, the 24/96 digital upsampling circuitry is
encapsulated in a separate metal module isolated and
shielded from the motherboard. It uses a crystal
CS8420 sample rate converter and a Burr-Brown PCM1738
DAC. The back panel has five
pairs of high quality gold plated real RCA female
plugs bolted to the back of the chassis. Two
additional digital input connections remain; they are
RCA S/PDIF and a fiber optic TOSLINK. The matching
aluminum remote control steps the volume up or down as
a digital display provides a numerical readout.
Remotely controlled source and function selection is,
Optical, S/PDIF, CD, DVD, SACD, Tuner, AUX, Mute, and
On/Standby. The first two are digital inputs so it’s
possible to hookup a CD player (as I did) two ways and
do an A/B comparison, of digital upsampling versus
analog. This is a load of fun and a great way to
listen to and compare cables while you are playing a
CD. My mind was awash in possibilities. Eventually I
managed to regain my composure long enough to declare,
“I’d like to review this amplifier!” Thankfully Roy
agreed, and so it came to pass that I was joined unto
it. Would it prove to only be infatuation, a pretty
face, or was it possible that we were truly made for
each other?
Mambo anyone?
I received a demo unit. I was told that a
well-known Stereophile writer had it and it was broken
in. The first time I listened it was driving my Aurum
Cantus two-way very revealing ribbon tweeter monitors.
The top end sound was just at the edges and bordered
on analytical and cold. Curiosity compelled me to call
back and ask Roy, “How long had this guy had this
amplifier?” “Three weeks,” he replied. Over the next
month or so that slight edginess melted away almost
entirely. I find all of this very interesting. Now
mind you, it can still reveal any harsh high frequency
artifacts if they are present on the recording. My
edginess test is the Rolling Stones Hot Rocks two disc
set on abkco-96672, a CD/SACD hybrid remastering. I
cannot fault the remastering or I should say
restoration of these tapes. But they do show their
age; edgy metal cymbals placed up front to one side
dominating the SACD mix while Mick is pushed farther
back in the center. I needed more information and so I
moved the Mambo into my Quad ESL 63 bi-amped system,
that way I could use it full range or just use it to
drive the Gradient woofers. Good thing I did, the
amplifier blossomed, or more accurately full range it
was far better balanced from top to bottom.
With greater bass extension the emphasis was now on
the midrange and that’s where this class-A design
shines. Of course this is subjective but I swear I can
hear that it is operating in class-A. The midrange has
a natural harmonic tonal structure, it doesn’t exactly
hit you between the eyes but if your mind is quiet you
can hear it. It is not the same as a tube midrange, it
doesn’t soften anything, and nothing is burnished in a
golden glow. It will paint sharp edges if that be the
case but if the recording will allow it, you can
believe and be there. Weakness if any, are not very
pronounced but I would have to refer to bass control.
A characteristic of Mosfet solid state devices used in
this design is that they only have about 25% of the
bass damping factor of Bi-Polar transistors. But on
the positive side Mosfet harmonic distortion is mostly
even order and similar to the sound of tubes, To put
it another way this type of distortion if any can
coexist along with the music without damaging it. And
so dear reader as you might have guessed every thing
has its tradeoffs. Don’t get me wrong you can
certainly do the Mambo with the Mambo there is no lack
of deep bass. If that were not the case this digital
24/96 upsampling integrated amplifier might have a
tendency to sound cold. In a shoot out with the $3,500
Bi-polar Krell KAV 300iL integrated amp both driving
just the Gradient bass modules. I would have to say in
absolute terms it’s not much of a contest the Krell
controls with an iron grip. Admittedly this is totally
unfair, a 50 watts per side $1,300 amp versus a 100
watt per side amp that cost 2.7 times more. Even so it
serves as a lesson in just where the limits of what is
possible are set. The Mambo goes deep the bass is a
tad fat and it is warmer but it satisfies, it is only
by comparison that any thing is lacking.
Coda
A few years ago I reviewed a stripped
down minimalist $3,000 dollar Japanese DAC and Deck.
It was hand made in the dark by a secret sect of blind
Buddhist monks living in a cave hidden under a
Shigaraki Shrine. I came away from that experience
vowing never to touch anything like that again. I had
found my calling; I would find good affordable gear
that would let ordinary people enjoy the music they
loved. I believe I have succeeded by introducing you
to the Mambo. If this amplifier were home grown, made
in the US I have absolutely no doubt that it would be
priced around $3,000. This is a slice of the high end
in an affordable pleasing package that you will long
enjoy. I’m going to battle it out with my wife, this
new love or a long weekend vacation in the Berkshire
Hills. She just doesn’t understand the heart of an
Audiophile; I can take a vacation in front of my
stereo!
P.S. The Audio Advisor Catalog #WC204 features the
Mambo Amplifier on page 46.
On line at:
www.audioadvisor.com
|
Shanling Audio,
division of Shenzhen Electronic Co. LTD.
Specifications:
Maximum power no distortion: 2X50Watts class A
Minimum impedance: (loudspeaker) 2 Ohms
S/N: (ratio) 101db
Frequency response: 5Hz to 100 kHz +/-1db.
Distortion, THD + Noise: 0.05%
Digital section:
PCM Upsampling to 24 bits 96 kHz
Processes all digital audio signals from 8kHz to
96kHz.
Physical Dimensions
Width 17” X 16 1/2” Deep X 5” High
Weight: 50 lbs. Packaged
Accessories: IEC power cord, Remote Control, 2 AAA
Batteries.
Price: $1300 |
Address:
For additional information contact
distributor:
Music Hall 108 Station Road Great Neck, NY
11023
Tel: 516-487-3663
Fax: 516-773-3891
Web:
http://www.musichallaudio.com |
 |