| Acoustic
System Resonators |
|
My Cherie
Amour,
(pretty little
one that I adore) |
|
Clement Perry |
|
November 2004 |

Nearly five years ago Stereo Times introduced
Mike Van Evers’ four-part article, “The
Art and Science of Audio System Tuning,”
to our readers. This instructive study of
acoustics and the taming of room resonance
modes proved to be one of our most read
articles. (It is still highly recommended
reading, located in our archives). Vans Evers
went to great lengths detailing the good, bad
and the often-misunderstood effects of
resonances. Here’s one of the more memorable
passages that comes to mind (from Part 2):
“The ‘Resonance
Response’ of an audio system is always a major
factor in its musicality. The most musically
neutral systems will have their resonance’s
spread out evenly with no clumps or gaps in
their distribution...just as the best
listening rooms have an even distribution of
standing waves. An even distribution of
resonance’s establishes a level playing field
for all of music's notes and overtones, allows
the proper harmonic balance of the music to be
preserved, and maximizes listening enjoyment.”
Funny thing, I not only believed
wholeheartedly in Van Evers approach, but
experimented myself by taking some of the
tests he suggested. I wanted to see if I too
could detect a change in resonances by placing
CD jewel cases atop my CD player, amplifiers
and preamp. I could not. Thus my conclusion
this type tweak was located on the fringe. I
wondered aloud if I was simply unable to hear
a difference or was my skepticism getting the
best of me? Don’t get me wrong. I believed in
the science behind Vans Evers’ comments, that
resonances could negatively effect a
potentially good sounding setup. I knew this
because I was a very early adopter of the Tact
2.2 Room Correction preamplifier and I knew
that with proper measurement and adjustment in
the digital realm, a lot of improvement was
possible. However, using the techniques Van
Evers spoke of―coupling and decoupling
devices, shiny objects along with different
types of wood, and so forth―well, I just
wasn’t convinced that these approaches would
work.
I want my system to sound great as much as the
next guy, but I’m not willing to go to any
lengths to make that happen. Checking the
directionality of all my wires, grounding my
AC in a star-configuration, checking the type
of walls that comprise my listening room,
concrete, wood, sheetrock and their resonant
characteristics, was in my book going a bit
too far.
Few audiophiles believe in enhancing harmonic
overtones by strategically placing objects in
a listening room. But consider my situation,
employing room correction as necessary to
create a sonically balanced acoustic space.
The Argent Room Lens plays a very important
role by removing unwanted resonances that the
Tact 2.2 can only partially control. Yes, I’d
read about Mpingo discs from Shun Mook and
Harmonix room tuning devices, but I always
considered such products on the fringe of
audiophila, a hobby already in dangerously
close proximity to your local nut farm.
No disrespect to Vans Evers; he does what he
does, and I’d be the first to admit he knows
his stuff. But I wanted an easier, softer,
more conventional way. Tact room correction,
along with Ric Cummins’ Argent Room Lens,
provided just that. As a matter of fact, here
it is five years later and counting, both
products remain in my system, and no white
coats have come to get me.
Fast forward to the CES
2004.
Walking
the 2004 CES with Dave Thomas, Mike Wright,
Key Kim and Delve Audio’s Oliver Solomon, we
were approached by Bruce Featherling of
Acoustic Dreams.
He was very excited. Now, if you know Bruce
and his brother Scott, then you know that very
few things excite these two—unless it’s
serious business. Acoustic Dreams, a
Featherling-owned business, imports such
high-end products such as dCS, Ayon and the
Lumen White, just to name a few. So we were
intrigued by all this excitement about a
mysterious tweak that the Featherlings swore “should
change the way you think of tweaks.”
“Yeah, I’ve heard that before,” I mumbled
under my breath. We were led into the Acoustic
Dreams room, which was featured at T.H.E Show,
and once we got inside and saw what they were
talking about, we thought it was a joke. Bruce
Featherling showed me these small metal cups
that resembled gladiator helmets for Barbie
dolls. Now, get this: the Featherlings told us
that by just moving these “helmets” around on
the top of each loudspeaker cabinet, the sound
changed dramatically. I was taken aback by
their enthusiasm and was hesitant to join in
because, quite honestly, I thought someone had
been passing around too much complimentary
wine. I suspected the Featherlings had lost,
well, a few of their feathers.
This didn’t dissuade the group of us from
accepting their invitation for a
demonstration. Hey, I know these guys are
serious lovers of music, first and foremost
(we’ve had long, long listening sessions
together whenever they come to New Jersey for
a visit). After a couple of A/B’s, and
swapping of seats, Oliver Solomon was the
first of our group to pick out sonic
differences. I could not. Oliver commented, “the
harmonics somehow improved.” I looked at
him like he needed a breathalyzer test. Then
it dawned on me that Oliver, like me, doesn’t
indulge in alcoholic beverages. But then Key
Kim, Dave Thomas and Mike Wright thought
perhaps they too heard a difference, however
small. All of these guys concluded that
something in the sound improved. Bemused, I
wondered why I couldn’t hear a difference
while everyone else swore they could? I
decided to get more serious and to really
concentrate on what I was hearing. I still
could not hear a difference in terms of
harmonics. But I did ask if someone was
playing with the volume control: it sounded as
if someone was ever so slightly turning up the
loudness.
It was at this moment the man from
Acoustic Resonators, Frank Tchang,
(photo right: the wizard
behind the curtain) an acoustic
alchemist himself, walked into the room, all
quiet and composed. He smiled graciously, took
a personal inventory of all the new faces in
the room, and then began to tell quite a
fascinating story. It was about the design of
the Acoustic Resonator, with emphasis on his
goal of improving harmonics and overtones
while at the same time canceling unwanted
resonances.
Meanwhile, Back at the
Ranch.
Frank Tchang suggested I experiment with
Acoustic Resonators in a more familiar venue,
and in due time a package arrived at my humble
abode. The Featherlings sent me two Basic and
one Silver Resonator. I installed them in a
similar configuration to that I remembered
from the Acoustic Dreams room: the two Basic
resonators were placed right on the front wall
directly behind my Ascendo loudspeakers, while
the Silver went dead-center at eye level. I
could detect only small changes in the level
of treble energy. In the end, I concluded they
“worked,” however subtly, but they certainly
weren’t doing enough to justify the asking
price. And for what they
ask for a Basic is a whopping $200.00. And
that's just for starters. Silver costs $350.00
each. A Gold resonator will set you back
$900.00 A Platinum $1800.00! I know, I know
any one paying those prices must have escaped
the nut farm
I was packing them up and preparing to
return them with a thanks but no-thanks note
attached…
Then the door bell rang.
The U.S. mailman handed me a medium-sized box
with a bunch of Charles De Gaulle stamps on
it. I wondered what on earth this could be?
Well, it seems Franck Tchang hadn’t quite sent
me all the necessary weapons in his acoustic
arsenal. For in this care package were the
Gold, Special Gold and Platinum Resonators
along with another pair of Silver and Basic
thrown in just for good measure. Probably just
as important was an installation guide.
Browsing through the guide I discovered just
how poorly the first three resonators had been
set up. For example, only Gold or Platinum are
recommended for placement between the
loudspeakers, and I’d had the Silver centered
there.
With a complete arsenal at hand, the first
thing I did was make a fresh pot of coffee.
And then checked my humidor for any remaining
Siglo VI Cohibas I had purchased in
Switzerland on a stop-over flight returning
from the Munich show. (Coincidentally,
Acoustic Resonators was a huge success at that
show). I suspected this was going to be a
special evening, and my usual preparation on
such occasions is java in one hand and stogie
in the other. I had done some research and
spoken with Franck Tchang earlier that day and
he assured me that I was in for a treat, if I
followed the setup procedure correctly.
Before I share my experience of that evening,
let me first tell you what I’ve since learned
about Acoustic Resonators. Tchang designs five
types of resonators that come standard with
maple-wood pedestals accented with two beads.
These small blocks of wood are well-seasoned
and carefully chosen for their specific
application.
Basic
is an alloy of copper and silver and is
designed for low-frequency room resonance. It
weighs 4.5 grams and Tchang says it produces a
“straight and fast” resonance. Its base
is soft instrument maple.
Silver
is the second in the lineup and weighs 5
grams. It is an alloy of two-parts silver to
one-part copper. According to Tchang this
creates a sound “light, open and airy”
in character, intended to open up soundstage
width. It uses the same soft instrument maple
for its base.
Gold
uses an alloy of 18-carat gold, silver and
copper. It weighs 7 grams and possesses a
sonic character that is “rich with a slight
compression.” It was specifically designed
for big, bright rooms with low ceilings, that
have lots of damping material such as sofas
and drapes. A hard instrument maple base comes
standard with Gold.
Special
Gold employs 14-carat gold, producing a
sound that’s “rich, brilliant with no
compression” says Tchang. It weighs 6.5
grams and is for a low-ceiling basement setup,
though any type of room will benefit due to
its no compression characteristic.
Platinum is the most expensive
resonator Tchang makes and for a good reason:
it is made of 98% pure Platinum, weighs 9
grams, and produces the most improvement of
any of his resonators. The Platinum, says
Tchang “possesses a wide-open sound with no
compression or compromise.” Both the Gold,
Special Gold and Platinum use a hard
instrument maple base.
That evening.
My seat position is on the long wall of my
living room. It measures about 21 feet in
length. Following the installation guide I
placed a single Special Gold dead center at
listening height on the front wall between the
loudspeakers. A Platinum went about 18” above
this. In the corners, close to the sidewalls
and about 6” from the 7’ 8” ceiling, I placed
a Silver. Below the Silver at about ear level,
I placed a Gold. This completed the front
wall. A Basic went on the rear edges of the
back wall, close to the corners, while I
placed the remaining Silver on the wall right
behind my head (about 3’ away from my
listening seat).
The
CD that has recently been getting the most
play and sending shivers down many a spine is
Shirley Horn with Strings—Here’s to Life
(Verve 314511879-2). Johnny Mandel, who worked
as composer and arranger on this album, was a
long awaited dream for Horn. Backing Horn was
a 49-piece ensemble of hand-picked musicians
including 18 violins, 6 violas, 6 cellos and 4
basses, while brass and woodwinds attacked
during Horn’s soaring climax in Here’s To
Life. This is an
amazing recording with superb musicians
showcasing Horn’s incredible repertoire.
Carefully selected accompaniment is one reason
she is so often compared to the three greatest
jazz singers of all time: Ella, Sarah and
Billie. This CD was recorded in 1992, over
12-years ago, but the sound quality is
extraordinary!
Listening to this wonderfully rich and
textured CD was never more splendid than when
heard with the Acoustic Resonators. For
example, on Where Do You Start, Horn’s
voice became immediately more resonant, adding
a three-dimensionality and more life-like
weight to her voice― acoustic qualities that
are generally associated with vacuum tube
electronics. My system, as you may know, is an
all-digital setup that is one of the most
accurate I believe available--by
sheer virtue of the electronics chosen. Digital
electronics can sound delightfully appealing
because of its clean, see-through clarity, and
an incredibly tight and well-damped bass that
allows one to hear into the rhythmic quality
of a musical performance.
I found it difficult to believe the degree of
change these mere metal “helmets” produced
and, as a result, experimentally removed all
of them, just to rule out the possibility I
was imaging things. Shirley’s sultry voice
suddenly thinned out, sounding almost anorexic
in comparison, and it displayed far less
harmonic color, overtones and shadings. She
appeared smaller and further back in the
soundstage. The leading edges of the strings
rolled off much faster, and the woodwinds
seemed to lose their breadth.
One of most significant aspects of this
evaluation is how readily my findings can be
repeated. Simply removing the resonators from
the wall—and putting them back—is all it takes
to do a thorough A/B test. No turning
components off and on, no switching cables,
and so forth. Stick them on the wall and take
them off. It’s that simple. Tchang was right
about trying them out in my home and on my own
terms. It also helps that I am quite familiar
with all the electronics as well as the
acoustics of my room. I was left with no doubt
that Acoustic Resonators not only work, but
work better than I would have never believed
possible.
Moreover, I have never regarded my stereo’s
sound as thin or lacking in richness. Yet,
after auditioning the Acoustic Resonators, I
could only describe the “before” sound as just
that—and therefore ultimately lacking
musicality. Franck Tchang and the Featherling
brothers are convinced that no matter the
price or sophistication of the system, whether
tube, solid-state analog or digital, the
results are the same: with Acoustic Resonators
installed the sound is richer and more
resonant.
Next Stop...Paris

Finally, I wanted to know more about
Acoustic Resonators as a company and about the
man, Franck Tchang. So it was off to Paris,
the City of Lights. After spending three or
four days sightseeing,
visiting fabulous sights such as the Louvre
museum (above) and browsing the
shopping districts with my wife, Key Kim
joined in on the escapades (unfortunately, Key’s wife had a
family emergency and had to cancel her flight
at the last minute).

We finally got the chance to visit the
home of Franck Tchang. He owns quite an
elaborate audiophile setup, in spite of a
small listening room. (One of the first things
you notice about Paris is how small most of
the apartments are. Of course, our hotel room
was no exception.) Nonetheless,
I was astonished at how vast a soundstage
Tchang’s system threw over a relatively short
front wall. In addition, the sound had all the
unmistakable qualities I had grown accustomed
to while auditioning his Acoustic Resonators.
The sheer musicality was breathtaking. Key and
I talked long into the night about what
measures Tchang must have taken to create such
a huge soundstage in so small
a space.
 
The next day we visited Tchang’s
factory (above) and
witnessed how he
heats and mixes precious metals to
manufacture the finished products.
Tchang has
a system in his office that is quite ordinary
in every way― except for the sound!
This
system uses Wilson Audio Cubs, some puny
integrated amplifier and a CD player by a
company called Octave. Both Key and I heard a
soundstage that literally went out of the
window, located left of my seat, and out into
the hallway, located to my right. Tchang
played with the resonators while we were
listening. Changes to the depth and width of
the soundstage were obvious. It occurred to me
that Franck Tchang knew more about room
acoustics and techniques for taming them than
anyone I had ever met. Our conversations went
on far into the night during the next couple
of days. The one thing you learn after
spending that amount of time with Frank Tchang
is this: his love and knowledge of music, both
from a musician’s standpoint (he plays a
wicked guitar) and as an audiophile, is
extraordinary. His no-nonsense approach to
dealing with acoustical problems is legendary,
especially in Germany where his products are
gaining wide acceptance.
My cherie
amour, pretty little one that I adore.
You're the only girl my heart beats for.
How I wish that you were mine....
La
la la la la la, La la la la la la
Barring
the Acoustic Resonator's exorbitant price, my
experience with the them
has served as a
rude-awakening. Personally,
I find their improvements, when Platinum, Gold
and Silver is used, on par with that of an
component--which somewhat justifies their
cost. Therefore, I suggest strongly, that you
give a set an audition especially if you've
ideas of upgrading your system. for that
ailing system. They’ve
literally changed what I’ve come to expect
from a music playback system, and I am
grateful for the experience. My thoughts about
using products such as these, at the risk of
being considered on the lunatic fringe, has
changed, and many others here and in Europe
have joined me. And if I have flipped my wig,
then I wish I had done it sooner, considering
the outcome. Highly recommended!
Acoustic Resonator
is a proud recipient of
Stereo Times' Publisher's
Choice Most Wanted Component 2004 Award!
___________________
Prices:
Basic: $200.00
Silver: $350.00
Gold: $900.00
Special Gold: $900.00
Platinum: $1800.00
Contact:
Acoustic Dreams
RR #5 Box 429
Fairfield, IL 62837 USA
Telephone: 618 . 847 . 7813
Facsimile: 618 . 847 . 4809
www.acousticdreams.net
audiosales@acousticdreams.net

|