| ZCable’s Z-SLEEVE v1 Line
Conditioner |
| The
Premier Review of a Premier Product, or
Bye Bye Gremlins |
|
Paul Szabady |
|
13 August 2003 |
Specifications
Passive Line Conditioner incorporating
ERS cloth.
8 inches long, approximately 2 inches in
diameter.
Price: $99 each (Available direct from
Z-Cable)
Address:
ZCable
7114 E. Douglas Ave.
Wichita, KS 67206 t
Phone: 316 946 3762
Website:
http://www.zcable.com
E-Mail:
info@zcable.com
I am not a paranoid man by nature. I’m not
prey to irrational fears about pernicious and
deleterious emanations from the Earth, the sky
or the Universe. So when I say that
eliminating the effects of electro-magnetic
interference and physical environmental
resonance on a high-quality audio system is
more important to the musical results than the
components themselves, please don’t infer that
I’ve joined the tinfoil-lined pointy hat
brigade. Just because you’re not paranoid
doesn’t mean that EMETICs (Electro-Magnetic
Environmental and Terrestrial Interference and
Corruption) aren’t out to get your system.
My investigations into (and reviews of)
physical isolation devices and suppressors of
electromagnetic interference over the last
eight years or so have led me to a major
paradigm shift: the sound of any component
that has not been effectively mechanically and
electro-magnetically isolated, is only
delivering a fraction of what that component
is capable of delivering, and is, thus, a
distortion of its true merits. This leads me
to discount the impressions I’ve had of any
component, regardless of its quality,
reputation or price that I have not heard in a
state-of-the-art isolation context. The best
of these devices have a greater impact on
performance than a component upgrade. Indeed,
a new component will face the same need for
isolation. Many a seasoned music-loving
audiophile has commented to me that they are
less interested in switching to ‘better’
components than in extracting all the
qualities of the system they already own. My
experiences with the best of these
EMETIC–taming products leads me to believe
that most listeners have no idea of how truly
good their systems really are … or can be.
The new Z-SLEEVE from ZCable offers an
extremely effective method to deal with the
EMI aspect of EMETICs. The Z-SLEEVE consists
of a hollow, 8-inch long black cylinder,
formed of a non-magnetic but conductive
material, through which AC lines,
interconnects and speaker cables pass. One
simply slides the Z-SLEEVE over the line to be
conditioned. There is a flexible rubber lip at
each end of the cylinder. The Z-SLEEVE
cylinder incorporates the sensational new ERS
cloth (see my review of
ERS in
‘Archives’.) Through a proprietary system of
spacing the ERS cloth layers with an
additional inner cylinder, the Z-SLEEVE
isolates the cable from EMI pollution, thus
producing a purer and less impeded transfer of
energy along the cable. The more sleeves used
on a given line, the more complete the
isolation. It would be ideal to cover each
cable completely. Applying only one sleeve to
a cable will still be a distinct improvement
(indeed, the improvement can be so great that
one is loath to try more) but this is a rare
case of ‘more is better.’
Though designed originally in conjunction with
Z-Cable’s own line of interconnects, speaker
cables, and AC cords, the Z-SLEEVES can be
used with any cables. The only limitation
might be some anaconda-like cables which may
be too thick to slide through the Z-SLEEVE.
For those whose experience with AC isolation
transformers and AC regenerators has been
mixed, the Z-SLEEVE instruction sheet
recommends listening to the Z-SLEEVEs without
them installed, and then later testing whether
the further use of the more conventional AC
conditioning is even necessary.
I tried the Z-SLEEVES on a large variety of
cables of varying quality and price, in three
different systems and with a variety of
components (including 4 turntables, 3 phono
stages, 2 CD Players, 4 preamps, and 3
amplifiers.) I focused first on interconnects,
then on speaker cable, then on adding more
Z-SLEEVES on a particular line until it was
totally covered, and then on AC cords. The
results were consistent, varying only in
intensity and in degree.
Common to all these auditions was a reduction
of artificially-bright background ‘hash’ and
of the white harshness added to midrange and
high frequencies. These most common effects of
EMETICs are the notorious bane of many hi-fi
systems. There emerged a far more natural
rendition of tonality and timbre, the
fundamentals of each note in proper balance
with its overtone structure, resulting in a
beauty and richness of tone with acoustic
instruments that belied their electronic
reproduction. Expunge ‘cold’, ‘clinical’ and
‘artificial’ from your vocabulary. Add
‘natural’, ’organic’ and ‘true-to-life.’
Consistent also was a similar improvement in
the perception of detail, particularly in the
conveyance of low-level detail. Extracting
subtle low-level detail is one of the primary
motivating factors for the purchase of high
performance audio gear; unfortunately, it is
also the first victim of EMETICs. While most
vision-oriented audiophiles will enthuse about
the improved sound-staging, depth and
extra-musical sonic artifacts, fine low level
detail resolution is much more important in
its fundamental musical role: revealing a
complete and accurate retrieval of musical
performance and meaning. After all, each note
begins and ends in silence and correct
portrayal of the silence or space between
notes is essential to create both melody and
rhythm. Improved tracking of small volume
changes in playing is essential to deeper
musical communication, as is the ability to
simultaneously portray different volume levels
between instruments. I was struck by a renewed
revelation of the intensity of emotion in the
singing of Joe Cocker, Steve Winwood, Rod
Stewart and Mike Harrison (of Spooky Tooth.)
Nuances of extensively over-dubbed studio
recordings were clearly articulated; realistic
orchestral recordings revealed a vivid sense
of instrumental place, soundstage
reproduction, recording venue and overall
verisimilitude. Improved too, was bass
resolution and level, somewhat surprisingly.
Best of all, the effects were not analytical
or destructive of the overall aesthetic intent
of the recording and performance. Nor was
there any compromise of large dynamic swings
and impact, a common flaw of more conventional
AC line conditioning. The Z-Sleeve’s effects
were consistently musical.
I was also most pleased by the effect on CD
playback. The format has always been weak in
low-level detail and any corruption of the
signal immediately produces that canned and
ersatz sound which has become the stereotype
for ‘digital sound.’ I’ve had deep
reservations about the format’s musical value
since its inception and only with the advent
of effective physical isolation—and now with
the Z-SLEEVES guaranteeing no corruption of
CD’s all-too delicate signal—have I begun to
actually enjoy CD listening musically.
I’m tremendously impressed with the Z-Sleeves,
not only with their effectiveness in dealing
with the pernicious aspects of EMETICs, but
more importantly, by their role in allowing a
deeper and more affecting involvement into
music. I congratulate Mark Hampton and the
other folks at Z-Cable for this tremendous
product, and give it the highest of
recommendations. The last question I ask
myself in the methodology of a review is “Do I
HAVE to own the item?” Within ten minutes of
my first audition, I already had the answer:
Yes!

|